News & Media

Print

August 18, 2017

No direct flights for memory retrieval

According to new research from the RIKEN-MIT Center for Neural Circuit Genetics, experiencing something and remembering it later is not a neural ‘direct flight’. The pathway in the brain's hippocampus that allows long-term memory contains at least one 'stopover' that is important specifically for retrieving episodic, personally experienced memories. This is in contrast to known direct memory circuits that pass through the hippocampus. This detour may be involved in quickly updating memories and responding to instinctual fears via hormonal release.

Memory formation in mammals appears to loop around the hippocampus, mirroring its physical structure: neural signaling from the entorhinal cortex (EC) proceeds through the central hippocampus to an area called CA1. From there, signals either take a ‘direct flight’ to deep EC, or they first make a ‘stopover’ at a region called the subiculum, and then proceed to the EC or other brain regions. Although the exact function of the subiculum has been unclear, this new study published in the journal Cell demonstrates that a connection from CA1 to the subiculum is critical for memory retrieval.

The research group led by Susumu Tonegawa investigated the role of the subiculum in mouse memory by genetically expressing fluorescent proteins only in these particular neurons. They could then selectively turn them on or off with optogenetics—targeted bursts of light that can activate tagged brain cells. While ‘turning off’ the subiculum during training had no effect on later recall, mice that had already learned to associate an environment with foot shocks no longer froze when the subiculum cells were silenced during subsequent recall tests.

This indicated that the mice could no longer retrieve the memory, and means that the subiculum is necessary for retrieval, but not formation, of memories. Activating the subiculum during the memory test also affected memory recall, in this case seeming to enhance the fearful memory and causing mice to freeze more often. This newly discovered function contrasts with the direct connection from CA1 to deep layers of the EC, which is essential for memory formation, but not retrieval.

Manipulating the subiculum also changed stress hormone levels related to the recall of fear memories. Inhibition of subiculum output to the hypothalamic mammillary bodies stopped corticosterone spiking in the blood in response to fear, but only during memory retrieval, not when footshocks were experienced during training. Conversely, hormone levels increased if this same connection was optogenetically activated, but again, only during memory recall.

Why are there separate pathways for forming and recalling memories? “Recall through the subiculum detour may allow memories that are important for triggering instinctual behaviors to be rapidly updated,” says Dheeraj Roy, post-doctoral associate and a lead author. Although the two hippocampal pathways are largely subserved by the same neurons, only inhibition of the subiculum circuit before testing affected memory recall in the mice. Coordinated fear behaviors like freezing and increases in blood stress hormones may prepare animals to effectively encounter and respond to dangers in their environment.

"The subiculum is unique in that it has a bidirectional effect on memory recall, enhancing recall when activated and impairing recall when inhibited," says Tonegawa, Director of the RIKEN-MIT Center. The fact that the subiculum sends outputs to many cortical and subcortical brain regions, and that it is widely believed to be one of the earliest areas affected in Alzheimer's Disease, makes it an exciting target for memory research.

Reference

  • Dheeraj S. Roy,Takashi Kitamura,Teruhiro Okuyama, Sachie K. Ogawa, Chen Sun, Yuichi Obata, Atsushi Yoshiki and Susumu Tonegawa, "Distinct neural circuits for the formation and retrieval of episodic memories", Cell, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.013

Contact

Laboratory Head
Susumu Tonegawa
RIKEN-MIT Center for Neural Circuit Genetics (CNCG)
RIKEN Brain Science Institute

Adam Phillips
RIKEN International Affairs Division
Tel: +81-(0)48-462-1225 / Fax: +81-(0)48-463-3687
Email: pr@riken.jp

Genetic tagging of subiculum neurons

In a novel genetically engineered mouse line, dorsal subiculum excitatory neurons can be tagged with fluorescent proteins (e.g., GFP in green) or optogenetic proteins for behavioral manipulation studies. Blue staining shows the entire dorsal hippocampus, in which subiculum sits at the output.

Studying CA1 and subiculum neurons

Low magnification image showing that hippocampal CA1 neurons (red) and dorsal subiculum neurons (green) can be genetically identified using two different protein markers. This permits the selective manipulation of CA1 or subiculum neurons during behavioral tasks in order to understand their functional roles.

Identifying inputs to subiculum neurons

Combining the novel genetically engineered dorsal subiculum mice with retrograde tracing technology allows us to identify major input brain regions that send information to subiculum neurons. In this image, CA1 neurons (red) are retrogradely identified using a tracing tool injected into dorsal subiculum neurons (yellow). Blue staining shows the entire dorsal hippocampus, in which subiculum sits at the output.